DComeaux wrote:...I mentioned this in another forum where someone (a guide) posted that south Louisiana duck lodges were hurting. I told him that it must not hurt too bad, yet. No noise from that crowd, other than opposition.
Rick wrote:DComeaux wrote:...I mentioned this in another forum where someone (a guide) posted that south Louisiana duck lodges were hurting. I told him that it must not hurt too bad, yet. No noise from that crowd, other than opposition.
Perhaps because the squawkers also seem prone to blame "commercialization" for not making it easier for them to kill ducks.
Trust, btw, that while I'm critical of your stance on this stuff, you know I still love ya like family.
DComeaux wrote:I know the teal we took last teal season were greasy.
BGcorey wrote:so how often does that happen? More importantly how often does it happen before the season is overaunt betty wrote:All that flooded corn is worthless once it's got an inch or two of ice on it.
My buddies told me a tale of them showing up at the walk-ins to find that ice was too thick.
So they wandered around scouting and found some ducks that got frozen to the ice. A short time later they got a visit from mister green jeans. The rest of the story...lol
The hadn't signed in and didn't have guns but they did have ducks. Hmmm.
Ericdc wrote:DComeaux wrote:I know the teal we took last teal season were greasy.
Figure they stay pretty well fed next door at Rockefeller?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DComeaux wrote:Dig the ticks from your dogs paws.
DComeaux wrote:Got Corn? If you don't think this is wide spread enough to influence a migration, then you haven't researched enough to know.
DComeaux wrote:Wonder why there's so much opposition to eliminate legal baiting? What about this is fair chase and ethical?
SpinnerMan wrote:DComeaux wrote:Got Corn? If you don't think this is wide spread enough to influence a migration, then you haven't researched enough to know.
There were 47 million ducks in the traditional breeding area. Of this 10 million are mallards. Then how many of the mallards are outside the traditional breeding area. Mallards are the park duck of all park ducks. Large numbers in nearly every suburb in America.
Do I think there are enough flooded corn hunting operations to have a measurable, let alone a major impact, no I do not. The millions of acres of no till corn and all the cooling lakes and warm water discharges, absolutely. I see it. That's why the mallards show up en masse AFTER the flooded corn operations in the area are frozen out. They don't arrive before the flooded corn is frozen and stay. Granted some do, but the bulk of our mallards show up after and it clearly is not impacting them. The reason they go no further south is the dry field picked corn and all the open water along with no hunting pressure at all once our season closes and you all are still banging on them as hard as you can for another month.DComeaux wrote:Wonder why there's so much opposition to eliminate legal baiting? What about this is fair chase and ethical?
I'm sorry you have a problem with me planting food plots for deer, but I don't see anything unethical or not fair chase about it. Same thing if you get that unpicked rice on a crawfish operation that the ducks are feeding heavily in. Are you going to say, nope, can't hunt here? The hunting is just too good. I see no difference on creating the same thing with the intention of killing ducks and geese. Next winter me and a buddy are probably going to shoot hogs over feeders in Florida. Nothing unethical and they aren't penned in. Which I have no probably with killing, I just don't find it enjoyable, penned animals. I just call it farming and not hunting.
Many states allow baiting. I have no problem with that nor would I for waterfowl. Hunt on the X or create your own X. I just don't see a difference other than jealousy by those that can't afford to create their own X. Something all the rules in the world will never stop, but just create more hoops making it even more restricted to the richest who can create their own X.
aunt betty wrote:Sometime take a little gander at some of the public hunting areas south of I-70.
Carlisle, Rend Lake, Crab Orchard Lake, Horseshoe Lake, etc. They all have huge areas of corn especially the Carlisle walk-ins.
That place can hold a **** ton of ducks and it does.
SpinnerMan wrote:aunt betty wrote:Sometime take a little gander at some of the public hunting areas south of I-70.
Carlisle, Rend Lake, Crab Orchard Lake, Horseshoe Lake, etc. They all have huge areas of corn especially the Carlisle walk-ins.
That place can hold a **** ton of ducks and it does.
Take away the lakes and open water. No ducks. Take away the flooded corn. Still lots of ducks because of the millions of acres of corn in the area. I hunted snows at Carlisle this spring. We actually rented a lodge that is one of this big high-end hunt clubs. The massive water pumps were sitting right next to our rooms.
All it does is help concentrate the ducks. I don't like that.
The "solution" is not to make it more expensive to legally bait. If there is one, it is to make it less expensive.
Look at the deer hunting example. If only one person in the area baited, it would be a huge advantage. However, since it is affordable for almost every hunter to bait, bait is far less effective.
But look at the cost of baiting waterfowl. It is cost prohibitive for the average group of guys or small club. This gives a huge advantage to the big clubs and the rich guys.
If every field that was hunted was baited, it would make baiting far less effective.
All the bait in the world won't hold ducks after they lose all their open water or snow gets too deep to make baiting impractical.
And for baiting to be effective for a season, you can't be banging on them every day of the season. They ain't that stupid. Look at how Rick's place runs their operations. They quit hunting by 9:30 every day. You need a ton of land and you can't hunt it hard and it is very expensive. If all the neighbors are running smaller bait operations, the ducks will be scattered and the bait far less effective.
To change the migration, you have to take away the water, which isn't going to happen. You also need to kill the short stopping birds much more than we do and the long migrating birds much less than we do. That too is not going to happen either. This is a "problem" generations in the making and will take generations to undo.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests