ducks~n~bucks wrote:R. Chapman wrote:ducks~n~bucks wrote:R. Chapman wrote:ducks~n~bucks wrote:R. Chapman wrote:ducks~n~bucks wrote:R. Chapman wrote:ducks~n~bucks wrote:Rex, have you hit that yet?
![]()
![]()
What are you talking about? Did I miss something???
Alright, just give me her number then.
I got it now...I think I had a little bit too much of 151 at the time.
So did you? If not, my offer still stands.
Yeah I understood, you want to get some pussy. Too bad, she's dating some fag Obama loving queer.
That's redundant, to use those two words in the same description. It would either be some fag Obama lover, or some Obama loving queer. There, now you know, and knowing is half the battle.
You can be a fag and a queer at the same time, just look at our president. Don't care for the cocksucker.
What I'm saying is, there is no need for the use of queer and fag at the same time. Just using one would get your point across, and leave you looking more educated.
Believe me there is a bucket full of more words I could attach to Mr. O. But of course it could land my ass in the hole.