the wife doesn't do anything un-exactlyRedbeard wrote:exactly?jehler wrote:Chach gets 1 3/4 cup a day
preaching to the choir Rick, just a good source to compare ingredients and what not under one roof. Some decent explanations of ingredients also, for someone who knows nothing it's a step in the right direction. I am naturally skeptical and forget others aren'tRick wrote:jehler wrote:Good source for research
http://www.dogfoodadvisor.com/
On the contrary, even if you agree with their biases, which real, board certified, canine nutritionists often don't, all they're "analyzing" is what's on the label and under the assumption that it's the worst case allowed by labeling law. They are not looking at the mfg's actual practices and what is, in fact, in the bag.
The prime example being "meat" vs "meal". A feed listing "chicken," for instance, rather than "chicken meal," as it's first ingredient is heavily penalized under the DFA system, on the grounds that much of a meat is water cooked out in processing. Labeling law requires that ingredients be listed by weight prior to processing, so it is possible that could be the case. But there are also feeds like Pro Plan where the "chicken" is still first by weight post processing, or "as fed".
Another DFA black mark on Pro Plan which I've checked out is the listing of "animal fat," which DFA gigs for being generic, rather than high quality like "poultry fat". Had they bothered to ask, Pro Plan would have advised them that the fat used is that of the particular formula's primary protein source, so a chicken formula is, in fact, using a fat DFA likes.
In any event, like any information on the Internet, one really needs to consider the source. DFA isn't the work of canine nutritionists, instead "The ratings given and comments made about the foods assessed on this site and ingredients listed are the opinion of the Editors, who are a small team of volunteers each with a long standing interest in dog nutrition." Bonjour.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
3legged_lab wrote:My dog eats his own shit when it strikes his fancy. He gets real excited over generic brand DOG FOOD.
I took my 13 year old black female to the vet for her rabies shot, the lady checking us in says "she can't be 13, her coat looks so good. What do you feed her?". I said "Ol Roy. But I put bacon grease on it once in a while."
You should have seen the look she shot me.
that's funny as hell3legged_lab wrote:My dog eats his own shit when it strikes his fancy. He gets real excited over generic brand DOG FOOD.
I took my 13 year old black female to the vet for her rabies shot, the lady checking us in says "she can't be 13, her coat looks so good. What do you feed her?". I said "Ol Roy. But I put bacon grease on it once in a while."
You should have seen the look she shot me.
gila-river wrote:Great, now the cops want to install dishwashers to. Just do your job Red and stop encroaching on our rights to replace appliances. That is not the responsibility of police.:lol:
Redbeard wrote:that's funny as hell3legged_lab wrote:My dog eats his own shit when it strikes his fancy. He gets real excited over generic brand DOG FOOD.
I took my 13 year old black female to the vet for her rabies shot, the lady checking us in says "she can't be 13, her coat looks so good. What do you feed her?". I said "Ol Roy. But I put bacon grease on it once in a while."
You should have seen the look she shot me.
3legged_lab wrote:My dog eats his own **** when it strikes his fancy. He gets real excited over generic brand DOG FOOD.
I took my 13 year old black female to the vet for her rabies shot, the lady checking us in says "she can't be 13, her coat looks so good. What do you feed her?". I said "Ol Roy. But I put bacon grease on it once in a while."
You should have seen the look she shot me.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
goodkarmarising wrote:3legged_lab wrote:My dog eats his own **** when it strikes his fancy. He gets real excited over generic brand DOG FOOD.
I took my 13 year old black female to the vet for her rabies shot, the lady checking us in says "she can't be 13, her coat looks so good. What do you feed her?". I said "Ol Roy. But I put bacon grease on it once in a while."
You should have seen the look she shot me.
Had a german shepherd that lived till he was 16 years old on el cheapo dog food.
Rick wrote:I'm old enough to remember when the guys running the hardest working bird dogs in the country wanted to see lots of corn in their feed. Now netspurts like Dog Food Analysis claim corn is the devil, something real canine nutritionists disagree with them on but that has caught on with the general public.
assateague wrote:Layniebug loves gummy bears. Doesn't mean they'e going to comprise 30% of her diet.
Olly wrote:When my grand father was a E-9 in the airforce stationed in Vietnam for his last tour he was an MP his whole career and on his last tour he was the senior enlisted member in charge of the K-9 units in country. He said before there was a such thing as dog food they used to feed the dogs corn flakes and steamed ground chuck. He was in charge of thousands of dogs at the time I think.
Sent from my phone.
assateague wrote:To this day in Korea people feed their dogs rice and kimchi, some almost exclusively. I'm certainly not saying that these things (fruits and vegetables and such) are bad for dogs, I'm simply saying that, in my opinion, they shouldn't make up a significant portion of the diet. A look at their teeth will show what they are biologically "meant" to eat. I know of no creature which has teeth and a jaw motion completely unsuited for eating grain, which is meant to eat grain.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
3legged_lab wrote:Maybe I just don't love my dogs as much as you guys, but the bastard won't be having a grocery bill as high as mine. I'm the alpha in the house.
assateague wrote:Again, not saying it's bad. And eating the guts out of something is not so much a preference for the digested grain (which, for the record, has chemically changed as soon as it meets the stomach enzymes- corn in a gut and intestine is not the same as corn in a pot on the stove) as it is a primal cost-benefit analysis. Eating the rich, easy to get to organs will provide more nutrition in a shorter period of time, with less energy required to digest than chewing on a hindquarter.
goodkarmarising wrote:My 2 dollar mutts get dollar menu Mcdoubles from time to time...Is that high energy enough?
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests