WaterfowlForum.Net

Douche taints

http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/news/Pages/ ... gCase.aspx

You'd do it if you knew wouldn't get caught.

Feelin' Fowl wrote:Douche taints

http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/news/Pages/ ... gCase.aspx

I am not sure what a "Douche taint" is, but I think I agree.

rebelp74 wrote:You'd do it if you knew wouldn't get caught.

No I wouldn't

They're just birds, for Pete's sake. A felony is ludicrous.

assateague wrote:They're just birds, for Pete's sake. A felony is ludicrous.

So mote it be

Goldfish wrote:

rebelp74 wrote:You'd do it if you knew wouldn't get caught.

No I wouldn't

X2

NuffDaddy wrote:

Goldfish wrote:

rebelp74 wrote:You'd do it if you knew wouldn't get caught.

No I wouldn't

X2

Fags

rebelp74 wrote:You'd do it if you knew wouldn't get caught.

i would. The thought of a freezer fulla mallard and sprig makes me hungry

assateague wrote:They're just birds, for Pete's sake. A felony is ludicrous.

no shit man. No doubt if convicted, they'll do more time than a sex offender.

And I like how they added the last two charges of shooting over their daily limits on mallard and on pintail. Apparently in the off season those daily limits still apply.

Redbeard wrote:

rebelp74 wrote:You'd do it if you knew wouldn't get caught.

i would. The thought of a freezer fulla mallard and sprig makes me hungry

1 crime

5 charges

Redbeard wrote:

assateague wrote:They're just birds, for Pete's sake. A felony is ludicrous.

no shit man. No doubt if convicted, they'll do more time than a sex offender.

And I like how they added the last two charges of shooting over their daily limits on mallard and on pintail. Apparently in the off season those daily limits still apply.

It's not the charge they got that's fucked up...It's the charge that sex offenders get.

It wasn't me...

The guy who was ineligible for a FOID needed a felony because he was already a felon and that's why he couldn't get the FOID in the first place. That dumb fucker had to have know what he was doing. These guys are gonna show up in court with the "I am a free man and have a right to forage, Universal Law" bullshit. Could be amusing.

Going duck hunting at Carlysle in March took some balls and I gotta wonder how they got away with it until the public and media became involved. The Carlysle bunch is pretty well-organized and tight-knit.

There was another story similar to this where some guys shot some something or others....the locals witnessed, organized, called in and got the guys arrested.

Wonder if they were doing it to have something to eat?

The Duck Hammer wrote:Wonder if they were doing it to have something to eat?

Does it matter as long as they were going to eat it anyway?

rebelp74 wrote:

The Duck Hammer wrote:Wonder if they were doing it to have something to eat?

Does it matter as long as they were going to eat it anyway?

Not at all. As long as it doesn't go in the ditch I couldn't care less what you kill or when you kill it.

Then we'll get along just fine.

Reckless driving- misdemeanor
DUI- misdemeanor
Threatening to kill someone- misdemeanor
Burglarizing someone's home- misdemeanor
Stealing $1000 worth of my tools- misdemeanor
Possession of cocaine or meth- misdemeanor
Exposing yourself in front of a bunch of schoolkids- misdemeanor


Killing some ducks- felony.




Fucking geniuses.

The Duck Hammer wrote:

rebelp74 wrote:

The Duck Hammer wrote:Wonder if they were doing it to have something to eat?

Does it matter as long as they were going to eat it anyway?

Not at all. As long as it doesn't go in the ditch I couldn't care less what you kill or when you kill it.

Now, do you mean them and their family to eat, or to get eaten in general?

We as a population have proven we cannot be trusted with harvesting of animals. We nearly eradicated all game animals from this country at one point. So, IMO there does need to be some guidance as to how many and when something can be shot.

assateague wrote:Reckless driving- misdemeanor
DUI- misdemeanor
Threatening to kill someone- misdemeanor
Burglarizing someone's home- misdemeanor
Stealing $1000 worth of my tools- misdemeanor
Possession of cocaine or meth- misdemeanor
Exposing yourself in front of a bunch of schoolkids- misdemeanor


Killing some ducks- felony.




Fucking geniuses.

Is that really just a misdemeanor?

Apparently, yes. I Googled misdemeanors, and there it was.

Woody wrote:

The Duck Hammer wrote:

rebelp74 wrote:

The Duck Hammer wrote:Wonder if they were doing it to have something to eat?

Does it matter as long as they were going to eat it anyway?

Not at all. As long as it doesn't go in the ditch I couldn't care less what you kill or when you kill it.

Now, do you mean them and their family to eat, or to get eaten in general?

We as a population have proven we cannot be trusted with harvesting of animals. We nearly eradicated all game animals from this country at one point. So, IMO there does need to be some guidance as to how many and when something can be shot.

Personal/family consumption.

Living off the land is your right as a citizen, but it is the right of every other citizen, as well. So, if you are being irresponsible with that right, it would fall on government shoulders to prevent you from infringing on the other citizens' rights... how that is done is beyond me.

Woody wrote:

assateague wrote:Reckless driving- misdemeanor
DUI- misdemeanor
Threatening to kill someone- misdemeanor
Burglarizing someone's home- misdemeanor
Stealing $1000 worth of my tools- misdemeanor
Possession of cocaine or meth- misdemeanor
Exposing yourself in front of a bunch of schoolkids- misdemeanor


Killing some ducks- felony.




Fucking geniuses.

Is that really just a misdemeanor?

For you to do it, yes......a laughable offence.

For Jim or me to do it, it would be considered attempted assault with a deadly weapon.

RonE wrote:

Woody wrote:

assateague wrote:Reckless driving- misdemeanor
DUI- misdemeanor
Threatening to kill someone- misdemeanor
Burglarizing someone's home- misdemeanor
Stealing $1000 worth of my tools- misdemeanor
Possession of cocaine or meth- misdemeanor
Exposing yourself in front of a bunch of schoolkids- misdemeanor


Killing some ducks- felony.




Fucking geniuses.

Is that really just a misdemeanor?

For you to do it, yes......a laughable offence.

For Jim or me to do it, it would be considered attempted assault with a deadly weapon.

So, what you are saying is, I have more experience wielding mine and know how to use it correctly, therefore present less of a threat than you.

Or is it that your's is older and less predictable and/or reliable?

Woody wrote:Living off the land is your right as a citizen, but it is the right of every other citizen, as well. So, if you are being irresponsible with that right, it would fall on government shoulders to prevent you from infringing on the other citizens' rights... how that is done is beyond me.

Which goes to my argument of "they are the state's critters, and as such, I should be able to send them a bill when one of their deer or geese damages my vehicle or property".

The legal system in this world is phucked up.