GadwallGetter530 wrote:Yeah. What Gila said about the filtering system. Other than that it could work. Gravity is a powerful way to move water from one point to another. Ive seen a couple of cabins fed via gravity from a creek or sprig about it on a hill. Same concept.
capt1972 wrote:the bottom of your water tower needs to be higher than your highest faucet. Not to confuse ya but for every foot above the faucet you will get about 1/2psi.
assateague wrote:capt1972 wrote:the bottom of your water tower needs to be higher than your highest faucet. Not to confuse ya but for every foot above the faucet you will get about 1/2psi.
Holy shit. Well then by my present plan, I'd get about 3 psi. Hmmm, back to the theoretical drawing board.
assateague wrote:So, messing around with the water heater (hopefully got it fixed. Drained it, replaced the pressure relief valve, refilled it, and fired it back up). When I turned off the water at the top, that is also the water which shuts off the whole house. Now to the question.
Let's say I build a platform the bottom of which is 2 feet higher than that pipe on top of the water heater. Now let's say that on that perfectly plumbed and leveled platform I put a 500 gallon tank, tied in to all the gutters from the house. (There is no water/plumbing on the second floor) Then, I tied that in to the feed to the water heater/house. In the event off a power failure, I then close one valve and open the other (the latter being the one leading from my new water tower). I would then have water throughout the house just as I do now, correct? Pardon me if this is a silly question, but I know nothing about water delivery. And all the Amish houses I've been in have hand pumps, rather than this imagined gravity fed system. Am I missing something?
Frylock wrote:assateague wrote:So, messing around with the water heater (hopefully got it fixed. Drained it, replaced the pressure relief valve, refilled it, and fired it back up). When I turned off the water at the top, that is also the water which shuts off the whole house. Now to the question.
Let's say I build a platform the bottom of which is 2 feet higher than that pipe on top of the water heater. Now let's say that on that perfectly plumbed and leveled platform I put a 500 gallon tank, tied in to all the gutters from the house. (There is no water/plumbing on the second floor) Then, I tied that in to the feed to the water heater/house. In the event off a power failure, I then close one valve and open the other (the latter being the one leading from my new water tower). I would then have water throughout the house just as I do now, correct? Pardon me if this is a silly question, but I know nothing about water delivery. And all the Amish houses I've been in have hand pumps, rather than this imagined gravity fed system. Am I missing something?
Too long...did not read the the whole thing so I got no answers for ya.
assateague wrote:capt1972 wrote:the bottom of your water tower needs to be higher than your highest faucet. Not to confuse ya but for every foot above the faucet you will get about 1/2psi.
Holy shit. Well then by my present plan, I'd get about 3 psi. Hmmm, back to the theoretical drawing board.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
AKPirate wrote:GadwallGetter530 wrote:Yeah. What Gila said about the filtering system. Other than that it could work. Gravity is a powerful way to move water from one point to another. Ive seen a couple of cabins fed via gravity from a creek or sprig about it on a hill. Same concept.
I think this is key, being uphill provides the water pressure, 2 feet above the water tank may not provide enough head pressure.
huntall6 wrote:MT is right.
Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.
assateague wrote:Why would I run it off the woodstove instead of the perfectly good propane water heater I have now?
huntall6 wrote:MT is right.
RonE wrote:Jim,
As long as the unpressurized water source is above the highest water tap you will have sufficient water for emergencies. So long as the bottom of your water tank is above the top of your water heater, the water heater will fill, the toilet will fill and the taps will run. The shower may not have the pressure you know and love but it will have some flow and the hot water will work. Fresh water has a gauge pressure of .432 psi per foot of water column. If you have a ten foot tall tank that has ten feet of water in it the pressure at the bottom of the tank will be 4.32 psi. now if the bottom of the tank is a foot above the shower head, the pressure at the shower will be 4.752 and at a tap that is three feet lower than the shower head, the pressure would be 4.32 + (.432 X 4) or 6.048 . As you use water in the tank, the pressure will decrease but water will still flow, you will still be able to bathe, flush, cook and wash. The diameter of the tank has nothing to do with the pressure. The pressure is strictly a matter of the height of the water column
assateague wrote:That's info I can use. Should go with 55 gallon diameter stacked rather than a big tub. Good.
waterfowlman wrote:assateague wrote:That's info I can use. Should go with 55 gallon diameter stacked rather than a big tub. Good.
Forget all of this good advice the fellas have given you......you're just gonna end up doing it the Amish way anyhow.![]()
assateague wrote:How would I keep it from freezing in the winter and blowing a hole in the sides?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests