Russian Obama Mockery

[FlintRiverFowler]

See Jim. Isn't mocking Obama a lot more fun than trying to defend him? Obama certainly makes it easy to mock him.

It's way easier, too!

That's about where most conservatives were at about this point in Bush's administration.

I just don't know if anyone can come along and do the necessary job, Spin, I honestly don't. There is just too much turmoil in the world, divisiveness in our system, complexity of issues, etc. I really don't care who wins the next election when it comes to Dem vs Rep. Hillary would be a disaster, other than the experience that Bill could provide. And I have yet to see anyone from the Rep field that looks capable of making positive changes. What do you think about 2016? I have a couple of thoughts, but I am holding them tight for a while. Will the economy be the central issue again? Will the Dem's continue to win via the minority vote?

Whys it always dems or repubs with you?
When is this country going to ditch these two special interest groups and vote for somebody who will make POSITIVE change in this country?

[SpinnerMan]

Whys it always dems or repubs with you?
When is this country going to ditch these two special interest groups and vote for somebody who will make POSITIVE change in this country?

I don't know your politics, but ANYBODY can run in the Democrat or Republican primary. For practical reasons, if your goal is to make real positive changes and not simply to sit on your moral high horse, you would run in one of these primaries.

Ron Paul ran as a Republican, but he is really a libertarian.

Michael Bloomberg also ran as a Republican, but he is really a leftist.

Bob Barr ran as a Libertarian, but he really is a douche.

Anyone that wants to make real change needs to run in the D or R primary. If the political machine could stop that, Eric Cantor would not be the former Republican majority leader. Had his opponent not run against him in the Republican primary, he would nt have succeeded in making real positive change and defeating career politicians like Cantor is real positive change.

[SpinnerMan]

What do you think about 2016?

I think we are going to get an unqualified president. I am not bullish on America's future. I think we have crossed a line where populism, cronyism, acceptance of corruption and law-breaking (see opinions on violation of immigration laws and acceptance of tax cheats) and me-firstism has passed a critical mass and our long-term trend is down.

I heard a quote from this speech by Benjamin Franklin at the Constitutional Convention. He describes what I believe is now true. It's pretty short and a very good read.

http://www.usconstitution.net/franklin.html

I agree to this Constitution with all its faults, if they are such; because I think a general Government necessary for us, and there is no form of Government but what may be a blessing to the people if well administered, and believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in Despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic Government, being incapable of any other.

The calls for despotic Government are wide and seen as the only thing we are capable of. I have a pen and a phone and will act if Congress does not being the most crystal clear example of that, but they permeate deeply in the Republican and Democrat parties and have existed for a long time but are growing more open and more bold.

[assateague]

Not really in the "sarcastic" tone which was the original intent of this thread, but I just heard this afternoon that Putin is once again making the world his bitch. In response to the sanctions we imposed, Russia is banning the import of all agricultural products from America and the EU. Say bye bye to the grain prices.

[FlintRiverFowler]

Whys it always dems or repubs with you?
When is this country going to ditch these two special interest groups and vote for somebody who will make POSITIVE change in this country?

I don't know your politics, but ANYBODY can run in the Democrat or Republican primary. For practical reasons, if your goal is to make real positive changes and not simply to sit on your moral high horse, you would run in one of these primaries.

Ron Paul ran as a Republican, but he is really a libertarian.

Michael Bloomberg also ran as a Republican, but he is really a leftist.

Bob Barr ran as a Libertarian, but he really is a douche.

Anyone that wants to make real change needs to run in the D or R primary. If the political machine could stop that, Eric Cantor would not be the former Republican majority leader. Had his opponent not run against him in the Republican primary, he would nt have succeeded in making real positive change and defeating career politicians like Cantor is real positive change.

No the entire system is shit. It's your type of thinking that ends us up with giant douche vs turd sandwich in every election.

[Glimmerjim]

Whys it always dems or repubs with you?
When is this country going to ditch these two special interest groups and vote for somebody who will make POSITIVE change in this country?

I don't know your politics, but ANYBODY can run in the Democrat or Republican primary. For practical reasons, if your goal is to make real positive changes and not simply to sit on your moral high horse, you would run in one of these primaries.

Ron Paul ran as a Republican, but he is really a libertarian.

Michael Bloomberg also ran as a Republican, but he is really a leftist.

Bob Barr ran as a Libertarian, but he really is a douche.

Anyone that wants to make real change needs to run in the D or R primary. If the political machine could stop that, Eric Cantor would not be the former Republican majority leader. Had his opponent not run against him in the Republican primary, he would nt have succeeded in making real positive change and defeating career politicians like Cantor is real positive change.

No the entire system is shit. It's your type of thinking that ends us up with giant douche vs turd sandwich in every election.

I don't that is really contrary to what Spin said, Flint. He is just, if I may speak for him, stating that for any real possibility of election you really have to fall into one of these categories. There is an interesting book out there by an aide of Ralph Nader's that explains how tough it is to run on an independent party line. Plus, I think there is a bit of a consensus that any outside the norm's are "cultish".

[FlintRiverFowler]

Whys it always dems or repubs with you?
When is this country going to ditch these two special interest groups and vote for somebody who will make POSITIVE change in this country?

I don't know your politics, but ANYBODY can run in the Democrat or Republican primary. For practical reasons, if your goal is to make real positive changes and not simply to sit on your moral high horse, you would run in one of these primaries.

Ron Paul ran as a Republican, but he is really a libertarian.

Michael Bloomberg also ran as a Republican, but he is really a leftist.

Bob Barr ran as a Libertarian, but he really is a douche.

Anyone that wants to make real change needs to run in the D or R primary. If the political machine could stop that, Eric Cantor would not be the former Republican majority leader. Had his opponent not run against him in the Republican primary, he would nt have succeeded in making real positive change and defeating career politicians like Cantor is real positive change.

No the entire system is shit. It's your type of thinking that ends us up with giant douche vs turd sandwich in every election.

I don't that is really contrary to what Spin said, Flint. He is just, if I may speak for him, stating that for any real possibility of election you really have to fall into one of these categories. There is an interesting book out there by an aide of Ralph Nader's that explains how tough it is to run on an independent party line. Plus, I think there is a bit of a consensus that any outside the norm's are "cultish".

come on jim that is sheeple thinking.

[SpinnerMan]

Whys it always dems or repubs with you?
When is this country going to ditch these two special interest groups and vote for somebody who will make POSITIVE change in this country?

I don't know your politics, but ANYBODY can run in the Democrat or Republican primary. For practical reasons, if your goal is to make real positive changes and not simply to sit on your moral high horse, you would run in one of these primaries.

Ron Paul ran as a Republican, but he is really a libertarian.

Michael Bloomberg also ran as a Republican, but he is really a leftist.

Bob Barr ran as a Libertarian, but he really is a douche.

Anyone that wants to make real change needs to run in the D or R primary. If the political machine could stop that, Eric Cantor would not be the former Republican majority leader. Had his opponent not run against him in the Republican primary, he would nt have succeeded in making real positive change and defeating career politicians like Cantor is real positive change.

No the entire system is ****. It's your type of thinking that ends us up with giant douche vs turd sandwich in every election.

How so? Just because you run in a primary, the machine cannot make you vote or do anything.

What is your solution? Losing elections doesn't change things as the libertarians have shown for generations.

I don't that is really contrary to what Spin said, Flint. He is just, if I may speak for him, stating that for any real possibility of election you really have to fall into one of these categories. There is an interesting book out there by an aide of Ralph Nader's that explains how tough it is to run on an independent party line. Plus, I think there is a bit of a consensus that any outside the norm's are "cultish".

Not fall in. Use the system as it exists in reality and not how you wish it were in your fantasies to make real change. Leftists/communists/socialists do not run as such. They have taken over the Democrat party and are moving the ball. The Tea Party has made more impact in a shorter time than most imagined possible. However, the fact is most people want our dysfunctional system or at least want to believe the lies and remain willfully ignorant.

You have to win elections or win a war to make changes. If you want to win elections, run in the D or R primary no matter what your political views. They cannot stop you and if you win they do not control you.

[assateague]

You quite obviously haven't been keeping up with events in Mississippi. Not only can the established parties stop you- they will get in bed with the "enemy" to do so.

[FlintRiverFowler]

Whys it always dems or repubs with you?
When is this country going to ditch these two special interest groups and vote for somebody who will make POSITIVE change in this country?

I don't know your politics, but ANYBODY can run in the Democrat or Republican primary. For practical reasons, if your goal is to make real positive changes and not simply to sit on your moral high horse, you would run in one of these primaries.

Ron Paul ran as a Republican, but he is really a libertarian.

Michael Bloomberg also ran as a Republican, but he is really a leftist.

Bob Barr ran as a Libertarian, but he really is a douche.

Anyone that wants to make real change needs to run in the D or R primary. If the political machine could stop that, Eric Cantor would not be the former Republican majority leader. Had his opponent not run against him in the Republican primary, he would nt have succeeded in making real positive change and defeating career politicians like Cantor is real positive change.

No the entire system is ****. It's your type of thinking that ends us up with giant douche vs turd sandwich in every election.

How so? Just because you run in a primary, the machine cannot make you vote or do anything.

What is your solution? Losing elections doesn't change things as the libertarians have shown for generations.

I don't that is really contrary to what Spin said, Flint. He is just, if I may speak for him, stating that for any real possibility of election you really have to fall into one of these categories. There is an interesting book out there by an aide of Ralph Nader's that explains how tough it is to run on an independent party line. Plus, I think there is a bit of a consensus that any outside the norm's are "cultish".

Not fall in. Use the system as it exists in reality and not how you wish it were in your fantasies to make real change. Leftists/communists/socialists do not run as such. They have taken over the Democrat party and are moving the ball. The Tea Party has made more impact in a shorter time than most imagined possible. However, the fact is most people want our dysfunctional system or at least want to believe the lies and remain willfully ignorant.

You have to win elections or win a war to make changes. If you want to win elections, run in the D or R primary no matter what your political views. They cannot stop you and if you win they do not control you.

You are missing the entire point. And yea they can stop you. That shit runs too deep. You get elected as a democrat or a republican and you are their puppet.

[SpinnerMan]

And yea they can stop you.

No they cannot stop you from running in the primary. You simply have to meet the same requirements as everyone else which is not a significant hurdle if you have a prayer of winning.

You get elected as a democrat or a republican and you are their puppet.

Only if you want to be their puppet.

If you ran in the Democrat or Republican primary and won and then went on to win the general election, how would they make you their puppet? Why would you agree to be their puppet? If you chose to be their puppet, that is on you and your lack of character.

If they are using mind control, why would it only work if you ran in a partisan primary?

[FlintRiverFowler]

And yea they can stop you.

No they cannot stop you from running in the primary. You simply have to meet the same requirements as everyone else which is not a significant hurdle if you have a prayer of winning.

You get elected as a democrat or a republican and you are their puppet.

Only if you want to be their puppet.

If you ran in the Democrat or Republican primary and won and then went on to win the general election, how would they make you their puppet? Why would you agree to be their puppet? If you chose to be their puppet, that is on you and your lack of character.

If they are using mind control, why would it only work if you ran in a partisan primary?

You can't really be this naive can you?

[assateague]

Truthfully, that's what I was thinking, too. The GOp, for example, has quite the record on sandbagging any candidates which don't adhere to THEIR party line, and they have shown that they will do anything to prevent it from happening, including paying off dem voters to go vote against the candidate.

[SpinnerMan]

And yea they can stop you.

No they cannot stop you from running in the primary. You simply have to meet the same requirements as everyone else which is not a significant hurdle if you have a prayer of winning.

You get elected as a democrat or a republican and you are their puppet.

Only if you want to be their puppet.

If you ran in the Democrat or Republican primary and won and then went on to win the general election, how would they make you their puppet? Why would you agree to be their puppet? If you chose to be their puppet, that is on you and your lack of character.

If they are using mind control, why would it only work if you ran in a partisan primary?

You can't really be this naive can you?

I guess so, if you would become one of their puppets.

Truthfully, that's what I was thinking, too. The GOp, for example, has quite the record on sandbagging any candidates which don't adhere to THEIR party line, and they have shown that they will do anything to prevent it from happening, including paying off dem voters to go vote against the candidate.

The establishment, GOP or DNC, are corrupt organizations devoted to amassing power for their personal benefit. The support for the man that talks about doing indecent things with animals should make that crystal clear. The GOP establishment would rather a Democrat win than someone that threatens the establishment. They have shown that repeatedly. Same with all the crony-capitalists. The DNC establishment is the same. And if power shifted to the libertarians or the greens or ..., that is where these corrupt power hungry people would gravitate and tell the same lies about how they really do hold the values of the libertarian voters dear to their heart, but ...

However, if you were elected, yes, they would do anything they could to defeat you, but if you won, they could never make you their puppet. I know you could stand up to them. Apparently Flint does not think he could.

[assateague]

Back to the regularly-scheduled Russian Obama mockery.




This light show was broadcast on the side of the US embassy in Moscow last night, in honor of Dear Leader's birthday:












And here's the whole video, if you'd care to see him actually eating the banana. A laughingstock. That's what we've been turned into.

[jehler]

Habby birthday lol

[waterfowlman]

Oh how the mighty have fallen.

[assateague]

I'm starting to know how the British felt around 1920.

[waterfowlman]

This one is so damn true, it's frigging disqusting!

[SpinnerMan]

This one is so damn true, it's frigging disqusting!

Yep, he is happy to negotiate with terrorists, but not "teRrorists." You sick the IRS on the teRrorists and flood the voting booth with illiterate third world voters to wipe them out so you can bring Utopian one party rule that has worked so well in Chicago, Detroit, DC, etc. that are free of any teRrorist threats.