AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
Flightstopper wrote:At 9 months you still have a very young dog and I definitely wouldn't take both. I would make sure and keep your focus on the dog and not shooting for most of the first hunt.
ChadEde wrote:I know there will be a lot of screaming and whistle blowing for the first few hunts. I know he will do fine on the hunting part just don't know how others would feel about someone training a new dog.
Rick wrote:Good on you for waiting until things had settled some at your club before introducing Pup to hunting. And good on him, too, sure sounds like he's got the right stuff. But you may want to rethink letting him go before being told to do so.
ChadEde wrote:Thank you Rick. I have trained him to hold until he is given a command but all the people I have hunted with have told me that they want that dog on the ducks a** as soon as possible. I kinda questioned that advice and was told that our tullies are soo thick and ponds are soo big that if you dont kill the duck dead with your shot it will get away and get to the tullies where a dog has a hard time getting it. I believe that I shouldnt let a dog out of my sight until all shooting has definitly stopped. I know I hunt with a bunch of old school guys and they have experienced far more things than me. I am definitley still going to make him HOLD until given a command from here on out. I appreciate any and all advice.
Rick wrote:ChadEde wrote:Thank you Rick. I have trained him to hold until he is given a command but all the people I have hunted with have told me that they want that dog on the ducks a** as soon as possible. I kinda questioned that advice and was told that our tullies are soo thick and ponds are soo big that if you dont kill the duck dead with your shot it will get away and get to the tullies where a dog has a hard time getting it. I believe that I shouldnt let a dog out of my sight until all shooting has definitly stopped. I know I hunt with a bunch of old school guys and they have experienced far more things than me. I am definitley still going to make him HOLD until given a command from here on out. I appreciate any and all advice.
You've been given bad advice by folks looking for excuses not to go to the trouble of steadying their dogs. Never mind the safety aspect and even that most dogs I know of being shot were actually shot jumping in front of their owners' guns, not by some careless guest with no stake in the dog. Staying put until the bird is down will improve the dog's mark on it and improve the odds of recovery, as pursuing dogs are dividing their attention between navigation and the bird's path and more likely to suffer depth perception problems or lose track of it altogether due to navigation issues or intervening cover - even if they're concentrating on the right bird in the first place. Have seen the proof of that time and time again in literally side-by-side comparison. The breaking dog is more apt to get lost along the way and start hunting short, while the steady dog with a solid mark is more apt to actually get to the area of the fall first. And it's not the dog that leaves first that has the best shot at recovering cripples but the dog that finds its scent trail first.
As for tules or other high, dense cover, once again the steady dog's perception of how far back into or beyond it a bird fell will be more accurate than a pursuing dogs. And you'll find that birds falling in heavy cover are a whoooole lot easier for Pup to track than those hitting the water, plowed ground or sparse cover in any case.
ChadEde wrote:I actually did notice him stopping short of the bird by at least half way and circling around trying to find the scent. Even when the bird was in clear view. Although this only happened twice it was somthing I reconized then.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests