assateague wrote:Goldfish wrote:If you think 4by will stop a spin, you've been out of Minnesota too long. How's that work to spin those tires on a fwd vehicle with the tires turned? You go straight. Same with 4by engaged. Go to turn and with the front tires trying to speed up/slow down, they are going to loose traction and you won't be able to turn. I have this same agreement with my retarded friend who thinks that having his taco in 4by will give him loads of traction, then wonders why he always bombs the front end into snow banks while i drift around the corner no problem. Have that bad boy in 2wd and your front tires will grip to at least point you where you want to go. If you are going to hit the ditch in 2 wheel, you are going to in 4 wheel just as well. Only difference is that I'll back in and you will be nosed in.
And Montana, if you think 4by would have helped you on black ice any more than the 2by, you were doing something wrong in the first place. I've never hit a ditch, and I drove a Camaro thru a MN winter, with Dayton Daytonas for tires, no snow tires.
I'll ask you the same question: is a front wheel drive vehicle better in the snow than a rear wheel drive vehicle?
Goldfish wrote:assateague wrote:Goldfish wrote:If you think 4by will stop a spin, you've been out of Minnesota too long. How's that work to spin those tires on a fwd vehicle with the tires turned? You go straight. Same with 4by engaged. Go to turn and with the front tires trying to speed up/slow down, they are going to loose traction and you won't be able to turn. I have this same agreement with my retarded friend who thinks that having his taco in 4by will give him loads of traction, then wonders why he always bombs the front end into snow banks while i drift around the corner no problem. Have that bad boy in 2wd and your front tires will grip to at least point you where you want to go. If you are going to hit the ditch in 2 wheel, you are going to in 4 wheel just as well. Only difference is that I'll back in and you will be nosed in.
And Montana, if you think 4by would have helped you on black ice any more than the 2by, you were doing something wrong in the first place. I've never hit a ditch, and I drove a Camaro thru a MN winter, with Dayton Daytonas for tires, no snow tires.
I'll ask you the same question: is a front wheel drive vehicle better in the snow than a rear wheel drive vehicle?
If you don't have weight over the rear tires, fwd will get you going faster, but I would never say it is better in the snow. Your tires only have so much grip. If you are using half of it for momentum, then you have less for directional control. Put that momentum at the rear wheels, and your front tires traction can be used for direction.
Goldfish wrote:If you don't have weight over the rear tires, fwd will get you going faster, but I would never say it is better in the snow. Your tires only have so much grip. If you are using half of it for momentum, then you have less for directional control. Put that momentum at the rear wheels, and your front tires traction can be used for direction.
huntall6 wrote:MT is right.
aunt betty wrote:This topic is awesome.
I mean from the viewpoint of an M.E.
Cracks me up.
Woody wrote:aunt betty wrote:This topic is awesome.
I mean from the viewpoint of an M.E.
Cracks me up.
Really?
Because from the view point of an ME, you and Assa are spewing nonsense.
huntall6 wrote:MT is right.
Woody wrote:aunt betty wrote:This topic is awesome.
I mean from the viewpoint of an M.E.
Cracks me up.
Really?
Because from the view point of an ME, you and Assa are spewing nonsense.
(MT)Montanafowler wrote:Woody wrote:aunt betty wrote:This topic is awesome.
I mean from the viewpoint of an M.E.
Cracks me up.
Really?
Because from the view point of an ME, you and Assa are spewing nonsense.
in 2wd, you operate on the balance of a pendulum. M.E would say 4 points of contact equidistant from each other is more stable.
assateague wrote:
is a front wheel drive vehicle better in the snow than a rear wheel drive vehicle?
(MT)Montanafowler wrote:Woody wrote:aunt betty wrote:This topic is awesome.
I mean from the viewpoint of an M.E.
Cracks me up.
Really?
Because from the view point of an ME, you and Assa are spewing nonsense.
in 2wd, you operate on the balance of a pendulum. M.E would say 4 points of contact equidistant from each other is more stable.
aunt betty wrote:d/dx x^3 + cos x =
huntall6 wrote:MT is right.
rebelp74 wrote:(MT)Montanafowler wrote:Woody wrote:aunt betty wrote:This topic is awesome.
I mean from the viewpoint of an M.E.
Cracks me up.
Really?
Because from the view point of an ME, you and Assa are spewing nonsense.
in 2wd, you operate on the balance of a pendulum. M.E would say 4 points of contact equidistant from each other is more stable.
Fuckyer big werds
assateague wrote:Woody, here you go. Yes or no:assateague wrote:
is a front wheel drive vehicle better in the snow than a rear wheel drive vehicle?
aunt betty wrote:C'mon woody. I gave you an easy as fuck first semester calculus problem. (He's looking up a program that does calc right now I bet)
assateague wrote:Goldfish wrote:assateague wrote:Goldfish wrote:If you think 4by will stop a spin, you've been out of Minnesota too long. How's that work to spin those tires on a fwd vehicle with the tires turned? You go straight. Same with 4by engaged. Go to turn and with the front tires trying to speed up/slow down, they are going to loose traction and you won't be able to turn. I have this same agreement with my retarded friend who thinks that having his taco in 4by will give him loads of traction, then wonders why he always bombs the front end into snow banks while i drift around the corner no problem. Have that bad boy in 2wd and your front tires will grip to at least point you where you want to go. If you are going to hit the ditch in 2 wheel, you are going to in 4 wheel just as well. Only difference is that I'll back in and you will be nosed in.
And Montana, if you think 4by would have helped you on black ice any more than the 2by, you were doing something wrong in the first place. I've never hit a ditch, and I drove a Camaro thru a MN winter, with Dayton Daytonas for tires, no snow tires.
I'll ask you the same question: is a front wheel drive vehicle better in the snow than a rear wheel drive vehicle?
If you don't have weight over the rear tires, fwd will get you going faster, but I would never say it is better in the snow. Your tires only have so much grip. If you are using half of it for momentum, then you have less for directional control. Put that momentum at the rear wheels, and your front tires traction can be used for direction.
You make as much sense as nuff. Do you get the concept of "drive wheels"?
aunt betty wrote:![]()
Care to see a copy of Tipler Physics for Engineers?
jehler wrote:Ima drivin my-a rear-a wheel drive a car-a inda snow, and it's a all slippery all over like a da spaghetti
aunt betty wrote:To see if you guys pay attention to the forums...
We argued this same argument begore but the focus was TIRES.
Now, which is better in poor traction situations and why...
Tall and skinny or short and fat (wide)
I am curious what you think...it should be funny.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests