
Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.
assateague wrote:That sucks. People that say modern compound bows give a hunter an "unfair advantage" have obviously never tried it, in my opinion.
rebelp74 wrote:Yeah I have a yacht, suck it bitches!
The Duck Hammer wrote:Been there done that Hudson. Took me 7 years to finally get one. Bow hunting is a bitch.
NuffDaddy wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:Been there done that Hudson. Took me 7 years to finally get one. Bow hunting is a bitch.
I bow hint a lot and learned a lot from my dad who started bow hunting in the recurve instinct shooting days. Been bow hunting for 8 years and only killed 2 deer. Shit ain't as easy as it looks.
Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.
hudson wrote:Ya you can't kill em all but I'll be after em again in the morn
Feelin' Fowl wrote:assateague wrote:That sucks. People that say modern compound bows give a hunter an "unfair advantage" have obviously never tried it, in my opinion.
Can you call yours modern? Kinda like the A5 guys calling their guns modern...
$0.008 for a pound of venison...
assateague wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:assateague wrote:That sucks. People that say modern compound bows give a hunter an "unfair advantage" have obviously never tried it, in my opinion.
Can you call yours modern? Kinda like the A5 guys calling their guns modern...
$0.008 for a pound of venison...
Heck yes, I've got a 3 year old Drenalin. High tech. But yes, the $0.008 a pound is nice, but only applies to my rifle. Although even figuring in a couple of new bows along the way, I still have to be around a penny a pound.
assateague wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:assateague wrote:That sucks. People that say modern compound bows give a hunter an "unfair advantage" have obviously never tried it, in my opinion.
Can you call yours modern? Kinda like the A5 guys calling their guns modern...
$0.008 for a pound of venison...
Heck yes, I've got a 3 year old Drenalin. High tech. But yes, the $0.008 a pound is nice, but only applies to my rifle. Although even figuring in a couple of new bows along the way, I still have to be around a penny a pound.
rebelp74 wrote:Yeah I have a yacht, suck it bitches!
assateague wrote:The furthest I deer hunt is maybe 3 miles. And it's all free, no leases, through farmers I know. Pretty darn cheap, any way you slice it.
Feelin' Fowl wrote:assateague wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:assateague wrote:That sucks. People that say modern compound bows give a hunter an "unfair advantage" have obviously never tried it, in my opinion.
Can you call yours modern? Kinda like the A5 guys calling their guns modern...
$0.008 for a pound of venison...
Heck yes, I've got a 3 year old Drenalin. High tech. But yes, the $0.008 a pound is nice, but only applies to my rifle. Although even figuring in a couple of new bows along the way, I still have to be around a penny a pound.
I thought you had an older Matthews...
Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.
Feelin' Fowl wrote:assateague wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:assateague wrote:That sucks. People that say modern compound bows give a hunter an "unfair advantage" have obviously never tried it, in my opinion.
Can you call yours modern? Kinda like the A5 guys calling their guns modern...
$0.008 for a pound of venison...
Heck yes, I've got a 3 year old Drenalin. High tech. But yes, the $0.008 a pound is nice, but only applies to my rifle. Although even figuring in a couple of new bows along the way, I still have to be around a penny a pound.
I thought you had an older Matthews...
assateague wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:assateague wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:assateague wrote:That sucks. People that say modern compound bows give a hunter an "unfair advantage" have obviously never tried it, in my opinion.
Can you call yours modern? Kinda like the A5 guys calling their guns modern...
$0.008 for a pound of venison...
Heck yes, I've got a 3 year old Drenalin. High tech. But yes, the $0.008 a pound is nice, but only applies to my rifle. Although even figuring in a couple of new bows along the way, I still have to be around a penny a pound.
I thought you had an older Matthews...
I had an SQ-2 for years that I loved. Decided I needed "newer and faster". Don't get me wrong, it's a really nice bow, but that SQ-2 was way smoother.
rebelp74 wrote:Yeah I have a yacht, suck it bitches!
Feelin' Fowl wrote:assateague wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:assateague wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:assateague wrote:That sucks. People that say modern compound bows give a hunter an "unfair advantage" have obviously never tried it, in my opinion.
Can you call yours modern? Kinda like the A5 guys calling their guns modern...
$0.008 for a pound of venison...
Heck yes, I've got a 3 year old Drenalin. High tech. But yes, the $0.008 a pound is nice, but only applies to my rifle. Although even figuring in a couple of new bows along the way, I still have to be around a penny a pound.
I thought you had an older Matthews...
I had an SQ-2 for years that I loved. Decided I needed "newer and faster". Don't get me wrong, it's a really nice bow, but that SQ-2 was way smoother.
Maybe that's what I was thinking of. I'm pretty sure that you referenced the SQ somewhere else, leading me to believe that you had (THIS IS FOR DUCK HAMMER), and OLDER MATTHEWS, rahter than a NEWER MATTHEWS.
Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.
rebelp74 wrote:Yeah I have a yacht, suck it bitches!
assateague wrote:GadwallGetter530 wrote:assateague wrote:I don't call MD "The Peoples Republic" for nothing. 6 month wait for a pistol, no black guns, Rain Tax, no Sunday hunting, no natural vegetation for blinds, and in and on and on.
No natural vegetation for blinds? What the fuck is that about? The other are dumb but at least a retarded argument can be made on their behalf. The cover deal is pointless as hell. Why do you have that rule?
It's to prevent the spread of invasive species, allegedly. Again, total bullshit.Use common reed in any manner for the construction of hunting blinds on lands owned or controlled by DNR.
The marshes and areas where most hunt are 99% reed, so technically when I set on a bucket in some thick reeds I'm breaking this law.
They even made me take off the Real Grass I had on my boat, because it hadn't been "certified seed free" by the state. Dickheads, I'm telling you.
AKPirate wrote:The sins of Boot and Gaddy are causing the Cali drought and knowing they have no limits to their depravity... :mrgreen:
Bootlipkiller wrote:assateague wrote:GadwallGetter530 wrote:assateague wrote:I don't call MD "The Peoples Republic" for nothing. 6 month wait for a pistol, no black guns, Rain Tax, no Sunday hunting, no natural vegetation for blinds, and in and on and on.
No natural vegetation for blinds? What the fuck is that about? The other are dumb but at least a retarded argument can be made on their behalf. The cover deal is pointless as hell. Why do you have that rule?
It's to prevent the spread of invasive species, allegedly. Again, total bullshit.Use common reed in any manner for the construction of hunting blinds on lands owned or controlled by DNR.
The marshes and areas where most hunt are 99% reed, so technically when I set on a bucket in some thick reeds I'm breaking this law.
They even made me take off the Real Grass I had on my boat, because it hadn't been "certified seed free" by the state. Dickheads, I'm telling you.
Get the fuck out!
assateague wrote:That sucks. People that say modern compound bows give a hunter an "unfair advantage" have obviously never tried it, in my opinion.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests